Demand exists.Shell is not capturing it.
How buyers research environmental products today — and where Shell is missing across search and AI answers.
Carbon Credits is the largest pool. Shell is under-visible across it.
Meaningful and growing demand sits around Compliance Markets, Project Types, Nature-Based Solutions and Partnering.
Keep the primary page as a gateway, not a catch-all
The primary Environmental Products page should own Shell Environmental Products brand/category demand, then route users to Carbon Credits, Compliance Markets, Project Types, Partnering and CORSIA.
Carbon credits remain the biggest demand pool, but needs commercial routing
The data shows 'carbon credits' at 49,500 volume with KD 56 and both MoM/YoY softening at -18%, so copy should convert broad demand into business-specific evaluation and enquiry paths.
High-quality supplier terms are lower volume but highest conversion fit
'High quality carbon credits' has 140 volume, +27% MoM trend and KD 14; 'carbon credit procurement' has 10 volume and KD 0. These should support Partnering with Shell and CTA sections.
Compliance market demand deserves a clearer page pathway
The updated data strengthens the case for Compliance Markets: 'emissions trading system' has 3,600 volume, +86% MoM and KD 39; 'carbon allowances' has 480 volume and KD 9.
CORSIA should be treated as a distinct aviation-compliance route
The data shows 'corsia' at 12,100 volume/KD 43 and 'CORSIA eligible emissions units' at 260 volume/+24% MoM/KD 0. Keep the main EP page as a router to the aviation CORSIA resource.
FAQ expansion is now data-backed
New FAQ recommendations adds actionable questions for Carbon Credits, Carbon Credit Projects, Compliance Markets, CORSIA and Nature Based Solutions; the strongest FAQ group is 'what are carbon credits' with 2,610 combined FAQ-variant volume.
| Keyword | Vol | KD | MoM | YoY | Intent | Tier | Target page | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| carbon credits | 49,500 | 56 | -18% | -18% | Category education | P1 | EP / carbon credits | Strong |
| carbon credit | 1,000 | 50 | -18% | -18% | Category education | P1 | EP / carbon credits | Strong |
| business carbon credits | 260 | 18 | -46% | +50% | Commercial education | P1 | EP / carbon credits | Strong |
| buying carbon credits | 1,300 | 10 | +0% | -19% | Procurement education | P1 | EP / carbon credits | Strong |
| purchase carbon credits | 1,300 | 44 | +0% | -19% | Procurement education | P1 | EP / carbon credits | Strong |
| buy carbon credits for business | 0 | 42 | +0% | +0% | Procurement / supplier evaluation | P1 | EP / carbon credits | Strong |
| high quality carbon credits | 140 | 14 | +27% | -46% | Quality,led supplier evaluation | P1 | EP / partnering with shell | Strong |
| carbon credit procurement | 10 | 0 | -50% | +0% | Procurement support | P1 | EP / partnering with shell | Strong |
| carbon credit supplier | 0 | 0 | +0% | +0% | Supplier evaluation | P1 | EP / partnering with shell | Strong |
| cost of carbon credits | 5,400 | 33 | -33% | -45% | Pricing education | P2 | EP / carbon credits | Moderate |
| carbon credit market | 1,900 | 47 | +0% | -45% | Market education | P2 | EP / carbon credits | Strong |
| voluntary carbon market | 2,400 | 47 | +0% | -47% | Market education | P2 | EP / carbon credits | Strong |
| carbon offsetting | 12,100 | 55 | +22% | -33% | Offsetting education | P2 | EP / carbon credits | Moderate |
| emissions trading system | 3,600 | 39 | +86% | +0% | Compliance education | P1 | EP / compliance markets | Strong |
| Emissions trading systems | 1,600 | 47 | +85% | +26% | Compliance education | P1 | EP / compliance markets | Strong |
| EU ETS | 14,800 | 50 | +50% | +23% | Compliance education / regulated exposure | P1 | EP / compliance markets | Strong but broad |
| ETS | 1,000,000 | 82 | +0% | +0% | Ambiguous acronym | P2 | EP / compliance markets | Weak as standalone |
| compliance carbon markets | 260 | 32 | -19% | -46% | Compliance support | P1 | EP / compliance markets | Strong |
| carbon allowances | 480 | 9 | -19% | -34% | Allowance procurement / compliance | P1 | EP / compliance markets | Strong |
| environmental compliance solutions | 170 | 10 | +21% | +0% | Compliance solution evaluation | P1 | EP / compliance markets | Strong |
| carbon pricing mechanisms | 260 | 31 | +136% | -46% | Pricing education | P2 | EP / compliance markets | Moderate |
| carbon offset projects | 1,000 | 31 | +14% | +0% | Project type evaluation | P1 | EP / project types | Strong |
| carbon credit verification | 90 | 18 | +0% | -18% | Quality evaluation | P1 | EP / project types | Strong |
| carbon credit MRV | 30 | 10 | +0% | +0% | Quality evaluation | P1 | EP / project types | Strong |
| carbon credit portfolio | 10 | 13 | +0% | +0% | Portfolio evaluation | P1 | EP / project types | Strong |
| verified carbon standards | 1,000 | 19 | -18% | -55% | Standards evaluation | P1 | EP / project types | Strong |
| CCP credits | 210 | 27 | +24% | +0% | Integrity label education | P1 | EP / project types | Supporting |
| Verra | 33,100 | 56 | +0% | +22% | Standards navigation | P2 | EP / project types | Supporting only |
| Gold Standard | 74,000 | 71 | +0% | +0% | Standards navigation | P2 | EP / project types | Supporting only |
| ICVCM | 1,900 | 19 | +0% | -33% | Integrity standards navigation | P1 | EP / project types | Supporting |
| VCMI | 6,600 | 36 | -19% | +22% | Claims guidance | P1 | EP / project types | Supporting |
| nature based solutions | 9,900 | 50 | +22% | +0% | Project,type education | P2 | EP / project types | Moderate |
| carbon sequestration | 33,100 | 66 | +22% | -18% | Scientific/project education | P2 | EP / project types | Moderate |
| reforestation projects | 2,400 | 32 | +0% | +0% | Project,type evaluation | P2 | EP / project types | Strong |
| carbon removal credits | 480 | 31 | -33% | -64% | Removal project evaluation | P1 | EP / project types | Strong |
| net zero solutions | 1,600 | 15 | +260% | +650% | Broader solution research | P2 | othersolutions | Moderate |
| decarbonisation solutions | 90 | 14 | +175% | -21% | Broader solution research | P2 | othersolutions | Moderate |
| energy transition solutions | 170 | 26 | +53% | +24% | Broader solution research | P2 | othersolutions | Moderate |
One hub, clear spokes, a single route to Contact
Environmental Products is the hub. Each spoke owns a defined audience need and a defined next step.
Use Environmental Products as the primary page title and explain what sits beneath it.
Carbon Credits should be highly visible from the hub, but the detailed carbon credit education intent should sit on the Carbon Credits page.
Compliance terms, project-type terms, nature-based terms, CORSIA terms and partnering terms should each have a clear owner page or content route.
The hub should include carbon credits, compliance markets, project types, nature-based solutions and partnering in copy, modules, CTAs and internal links.
The hub should route users into deeper pages, and those pages should link back to the hub and forward to the next journey step.
Explains the broader Shell offering and routes users into the right topic.
Primary educational route from the hub
Next step from Carbon Credits and hub
Regulatory route from hub, Carbon Credits and Project Types
Visible route from hub and Project Types
Nested under Compliance Markets
Commercial next step from consideration and specialist pages
Final action point from lower,funnel pages
Thought leadership route that links back into the journey
Explain what Shell means by Environmental Products and route users into the right offer area.
This is the main correction: the hub should include mixed topic language, but as navigational and supporting signals, not as all,purpose primary ranking targets.
Answer education,led questions and introduce users to Shell's wider Environmental Products journey.
Carbon Credits should be the main page for carbon,credit education and search demand, not the replacement homepage.
Help users compare different project or solution types after they understand the basics.
This page should be positioned as the bridge between learning and commercial evaluation.
Support users with compliance,led or regulated,market information needs.
Compliance Markets should not be buried as a minor topic. It should have a clearer specialist pathway.
Give users a visible route into one of the major offer or project,type areas under Environmental Products.
Because the homepage covers more than carbon credits, Nature-Based Solutions should be visible in the keyword cluster map and homepage journey.
Serve sector,specific compliance intent without overcrowding the EP hub.
CORSIA should be treated as a distinct specialist route, not as a core homepage keyword.
Convert users who are evaluating Shell as a supplier, partner or support provider.
Supplier and partnership terms may be lower volume but should have strong conversion fit.
Capture long,tail informational demand and reduce confusion at each journey stage.
FAQs should support the cluster map rather than becoming a disconnected content block.
Convert lower,funnel users into enquiries.
Contact should be available across the journey but should not be the only next step for early,stage users.
The homepage can mention all major offering terms, but specific keyword ownership should sit with child pages.
- What Environmental Products means
- Carbon Credits
- Project Types
- Compliance Markets
- Nature-Based Solutions
- Partnering with Shell
- Contact our experts
Own carbon,credit education and broad informational demand.
- Definition of carbon credits
- How carbon credits work
- Why businesses use carbon credits
- How carbon credits connect to project types
- FAQs
Own project comparison and solution,selection terms.
- Overview of project types
- Nature,based projects
- Removal projects
- Avoidance or reduction projects
- How to choose a project type
Own specialist compliance,led search intent.
- What compliance markets are
- Voluntary vs compliance markets
- Relevant sector,specific compliance topics
- How Shell can support compliance needs
If no dedicated page exists, create a clear module or section within Project Types and link to it from the homepage.
- What nature-based solutions are
- Types of nature-based projects
- How nature-based solutions connect to carbon credits
- Benefits and considerations
Treat CORSIA as a specialist route under Compliance Markets, not as a homepage keyword target.
- What CORSIA is
- How CORSIA relates to carbon credits
- Compliance support options
- FAQs
Own supplier, commercial and Shell,specific lower,funnel demand.
- Why partner with Shell
- Shell's environmental products expertise
- Support across carbon markets
- Contact route
Own research,led and proof,led search intent, then route users back into the EP journey.
- Report summary
- Key findings
- What this means for carbon credits
- Next steps with Shell
Own conversion,led contact and expert support terms.
- Contact intro
- What our experts can help with
- Form
- Related links
Keep Environmental Products as the homepage title. Strengthen the page with user-facing sub-messaging and journey cards for carbon credits, compliance markets, project types, nature-based solutions, partnering and contact. This preserves Shell's broader business architecture while making the page clearer for users and search engines.
Shell is under-represented in AI answers
Buyers increasingly use generative AI to research carbon and compliance. Where Shell isn't cited, competitors and NGOs shape the answer.
Environmental Products is where Shell shows its biggest gap vs top organisations. Ranked #37 at 1.3% visibility, while Verra leads at 28.8%.
Verra dominates the conversation but coverage is mainly negative — driven by the "avoided deforestation" credits scandal that allegedly overstated offsetting impact.
| Rank | Entity | Visibility Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verra | 28.8% |
| 2 | European Union | 15.4% |
| 3 | Climate Action Reserve | 13.3% |
| 4 | American Carbon Registry | 13.3% |
| 5 | California | 12.5% |
| 37 | Shell | 1.3% |
When LLMs are asked to evaluate Shell on Environmental Products, sentiment skews positive but a sizeable negative tail persists. Visible initiatives don't fully offset scepticism around credibility and impact.
Investment in low-carbon solutions, emissions reduction targets, and offering environmental products (e.g. Holland Hydrogen 1, carbon credits).
High emissions, greenwashing concerns, legal challenges and investment alignment issues.
The conversation is overwhelmingly shaped by informational and institutional sources — Wikipedia and europa.eu lead, followed by financial intelligence sites.
Sector NGOs like OffsetGuide and the World Economic Forum reinforce a narrative around climate action, transparency and voluntary carbon markets.
Just 16 citations — limited to a few pages (what-we-do/nbs, sustainability report, an AI for NBS page). Shell's own content barely registers.
| Entity | Category | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | General Knowledge | 8.9K |
| europa.eu | Institutional / Government | 3.6K |
| investopedia.com | Financial Intelligence | 3.2K |
| carboncredits.com | Financial Intelligence | 3.2K |
| senken.io | Corporate | 2.9K |
| climateseed.com | Corporate | 2.9K |
| climateimpact.com | Corporate | 2.8K |
| offsetguide.org | Sector,Specific NGO | 2.8K |
| weforum.org | Sector,Specific NGO | 2.2K |
| shell.com | Owned | 16 |
Visibility summary for Environmental Products citations only. Aggregate across 15 markets and 4 LLMs.
Search, ownership and AI visibility all point the same way: stronger discoverability and a clearer routing hub.
See the plan